Billionaire Alki David Agreed To Pay $58 Million In Sexual Battery And Harrassment Case

Alki David, the billionaire who based, amongst different issues, the corporate Hologram USA, has now been ordered to pay what a authorized skilled tells the Los Angeles Occasions is without doubt one of the largest sums of damages ever awarded in any civil employment case: $58.25 million each compensatory and punitive damages to Mahim Khan, a former worker he allegedly sexually harassed whereas she labored for him. An enchantment is within the works. We’re together with a full assertion from Alki David on the backside of his article which is definitely value your time.

It additionally must be famous that in the course of the case, the choose barred Alki from representing himself. In a earlier trial in opposition to a girl named Elizabeth Taylor, Alki was capable of signify himself. That case resulted in a mistrial with Eight jurors ruling in Alki’s favor and several other jurors later telling Los Angeles Journal that they didn’t discover Elizabeth’s claims credible.

Yesterday’s ruling is barely the most recent such determination by a jury in opposition to David. Per week previous to the ruling awarding Khan $50 million in punitive damages, the jury within the case had already awarded $8.25 million in compensatory damages to her, the third former worker of David’s to accuse him of sexual misconduct.

In April, David was ordered to pay a complete of $11.1 million in damages to Chastity Jones, and in November a former Hologram USA comedy author named Lauren Reeves was awarded some $5 million in damages from David for varied harassment allegations. Altogether, David has had verdicts totaling virtually $74 million in compensatory and punitive damages in opposition to him.

For David’s half, he has denied probably the most critical allegations in opposition to him, saying that he “never touched any of these women,” however he did not efficiently persuade the jury within the Khan case of this. In response to the report on the case within the Los Angeles Occasions, his conduct within the courtroom was nothing wanting a debacle:

” David, who represented himself within the Taylor trial, remained belligerent, defiant and disruptive all through his a number of trials in Los Angeles County Superior Court docket. He steadily erupted in profanity-laced outbursts whereas mocking his accusers and their attorneys, incomes him almost $10,000 in sanctions; he was ejected from the courtroom on a number of events.”

One of many jurors who awarded the $58 million to Khan was 90-year-old Reg Inexperienced, who went so far as calling David’s conduct “grotesque.” He says this was an enormous issue within the jury’s determination to award such a big sum in punitive damages within the case.

Full Assertion from Alki David, CEO of FilmOn Networks:

“How is it justice if I am not allowed to current any protection in any respect? No witnesses. No proof. Gloria Allred and Nathan Goldberg knew that they had a shedding case in opposition to me and my firms and their solely possibility — with a lot contingency cash on the desk — was to cheat. In truth, they took the choose’s bias, or agenda, or no matter it was, as nothing lower than a license to lie.

$58 million {dollars} is an absurd quantity, designed solely to generate headlines. It’s nothing however a PR stunt, a advertising scheme to deliver Allred and daughter Lisa Bloom extra shoppers and bulldoze future juries. Nicely, now that is backfiring on them as individuals begin to take a look at what’s actually occurring right here.

This trial proves that not solely is the system damaged. It is in a state of emergency. It is an emergency for employment legislation, for enterprise and innovation within the state of California. It is an emergency for justice.

In his closing arguments, Goldberg led the jury to imagine I did not name any witnesses by selection. The reality is the choose blocked each potential witness I needed to name, even to rebut new lies from the plaintiff and her witnesses.

I will say it once more to all of you–as I used to be prevented from saying in courtroom–I by no means touched Mahim Khan inappropriately. I by no means sexually harassed her or any of my staff.  Now we have proof that she conspired with different accusers after studying a couple of earlier sealed settlement. Each Allred and Bloom have violated courtroom orders associated to this settlement. Now we have proof that amongst this community of accusers Allred and Bloom assembled and divided up, cash and jobs had been supplied to witnesses, and calls for had been made to recruit extra accusers.

We caught Khan and her witnesses in apparent lies that will have impeached them in entrance of the jury if the choose hadn’t denied each official transfer we made at protection. We even have a police report and texts that present Khan actually threatened the newborn of one among my witnesses.

With me unable to mount any protection, the plaintiff’s lies grew in quantity, sprouted elaborations, even contradicted themselves. Why was the choose so decided to dam me from presenting any protection in any way? Why did she ignore egregious, unethical, even unlawful habits by the plaintiff and her attorneys? Everybody must be asking these questions. “

 

About The Author

You might be interested in

LEAVE YOUR COMMENT